Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry


Considering getting out this afternoon, looking at movie listings. Robin Hood opened this week. I didn't expect to be wildly excited about it, but I didn't expect to care this little either. I'm quite 'meh' on the subject of Russell Crowe, but Cate Blanchett is an entirely different matter.

Then I saw the TV spots and the trailer, and absolutely the only thing appealing to me about either is the quick glimpse of Marian in armor.

I'm not their target audience (being, y'know, a girl, and them being Hollywood marketing types), but I'm very much the untargeted-but-generally-reliable audience that they don't realize they need. Betcha I'm not the only one reacting with utter indifference. Which makes me more interested in seeing the box office returns than I am in seeing the movie.



( 33 comments — Leave a comment )
May. 15th, 2010 12:22 pm (UTC)
You know, I wanna be excited by this movie, but I'm not.
Like you say, the only thing that makes me go "I may wanna see this" is Cate Blanchett. And I guess I'm going to have to find the US trailer, cos the one I saw had less than a glimpse of Cate. Possibly wearing armour, but I couldn't say for sure. That's how "less than a glimpse" it was..


Maybe I should watch the uber-cheezy Kevin Costner version tonight ;-)
May. 15th, 2010 01:22 pm (UTC)
There's like half a second of her pulling her visor down.

Other than that, I think the TV spots might have a glimpse or two of her face, and the theatrical trailer has a line to the effect of "we're stuck sharing this room, you stay over there."

I think that's part of my lack of interest. They might have "Oscar Winner Cate Blanchett" plastered on the print ads, but if they're barely going to show her in the trailers, they're not interested in having me there. Why should I return the favor?

Maybe I should watch the uber-cheezy Kevin Costner version tonight ;-)

I should not love Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio and her big vase quite so much, but I do anyway.
(no subject) - stef94 - May. 15th, 2010 02:52 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - amilyn - May. 15th, 2010 10:00 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - wiliqueen - May. 15th, 2010 10:36 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - amilyn - May. 15th, 2010 10:55 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - wiliqueen - May. 17th, 2010 11:19 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - stef94 - May. 18th, 2010 01:10 pm (UTC) - Expand
(Deleted comment)
May. 15th, 2010 01:24 pm (UTC)
And see, that might have been interesting. I don't know that I would have wanted to see it in the theatre, but at least it might have been interesting.

Silly Hollywood.
May. 15th, 2010 12:46 pm (UTC)
I'm not even particularly interested in Cate Blanchett, so I have pretty much zero interest in this movie, except to see how badly it does, numbers-wise.
May. 15th, 2010 04:23 pm (UTC)
Usually if I don't care about a movie, I don't care about the numbers. But in this case I'm curious.
May. 15th, 2010 12:49 pm (UTC)
A big "me too." I'm a total sucker for traditional stories reinvented, especially when the gender roles are upended, and I was looking forward to this movie for that reason. But you're right - it doesn't look like it's worth the bother.
May. 15th, 2010 04:24 pm (UTC)
It does seem like they've maybe reinvented something -- certainly the voiceover in the trailer lays overt claim to it -- but I'm darned if I can figure out what. It's really a very muddy trailer.
May. 15th, 2010 01:16 pm (UTC)
Yeah. Cate in armor and swinging a sword was about the only reason I was interested in it.
May. 15th, 2010 04:26 pm (UTC)
And y'know, if they had made the slightest effort to use it as a selling point, I'd probably be there with bells on. I'd probably end up feeling used, but I'd be there.

So maybe ignoring will work out best overall anyway.
May. 15th, 2010 03:01 pm (UTC)
I am excited about "Robin Hood"! Alan Doyle from Great Big Sea is playing the Bard!

May. 15th, 2010 04:22 pm (UTC)
A worthy reason. Enjoy!
(no subject) - aceofkittens - May. 17th, 2010 02:00 am (UTC) - Expand
May. 15th, 2010 05:18 pm (UTC)
Me too! No interest at all, and this should be the kind of thing that gets my interest. And I even like Russell Crowe. :-/

Flickfilospher.com reported being hugely underwhelmed, too. Like they tried to squeeze a TV series worth of story into a movie, so everyone got like 2 lines of characterization.
May. 15th, 2010 06:47 pm (UTC)
Oooh, that doesn't bode well either.

And I just read cleolinda's reaction post, which is freakin' hilarious as always, but certainly doesn't make me in any more of a hurry to rush out and slap down my hard-earned cash.
May. 15th, 2010 07:14 pm (UTC)
My kneejerk reaction to learning there's another Robin Hood movie was, "Another Robin Hood movie? Why?"
May. 15th, 2010 07:23 pm (UTC)
You're not alone; it's an excellent question. Though it has been a while. Even so, one should still have a solid something new to say before proceeding, and they really don't seem to.

In fact, according to cleolinda, they discarded several potential somethings new along the way, any of which sound more likely to have been more interesting.
May. 15th, 2010 10:31 pm (UTC)
My reaction to the commercials and previews has varied across the tiny spectrum between "Oh, that looks historical, what's -- Robin Hood? You're kidding!" to "That does not look or sound the least bit like Robin Hood, and no the one shot of the bow and arrow does not mend all sins."

Robin Hood is like Zorro and King Arthur and Superman with me. I will generally watch any movie incarnation -- and gripe about it after, sure. :-) But this one hasn't even convinced me that it wants to be a version of Robin Hood at all.
May. 15th, 2010 10:35 pm (UTC)
That seems to be the general consensus among those who've actually seen it, to judge from the comments on cleolinda's (spoilery, if you care; I didn't) post. It sounds like they made some very strange choices that would have been more effective if divorced from the Robin Hood name entirely.
May. 15th, 2010 11:35 pm (UTC)
I haven't seen the movie yet, but I've been looking forward to it since I heard about it. I loved Gladiator and am looking forward to seeing what Ridley Scott does with this. I was actually surprised to find out that Cate was playing Marian...it doesn't seem like a good fit to me.
May. 16th, 2010 08:49 am (UTC)
I liked Gladiator well enough, but Scott is up and down for me.

Hope you love it!
May. 17th, 2010 10:47 am (UTC)
I'm looking forward to the film, and I'm not perturbed when there seems to be little Marian in the trailer. The movie, after all, is called Robin Hood, and men have a right to be heroes, too. When there's a movie called Marian, then I'll expect more from the Medieval Riot Grrrls.

Sometimes the story really is just about the guys. It happens. We can't expect all medieval settings to conform with postmodern feminism. You can't force history to fit our modern expectations and political correctness, and if a movie is going to go toward historical verisimilitude, then women will be getting their power they way they did then (with a few glaring exceptions): through their husbands, fathers and sons.

May. 17th, 2010 11:10 am (UTC)
Sometimes the story really is just about the guys. It happens.

I know that, and I like plenty of them. I guess my post wasn't clear.

I don't even mind so much that it seems to have ended up being something that might have been better served being not associated with Robin Hood at all, but an independent medieval adventure.

A lot of it seems to be, as I said, that I'm pretty "meh" about Russell Crowe. Sometimes he's on, and I'm happy to watch him. This just doesn't seem like one of those times. I expected to get some spark of excitement from the trailers, even allowing for Ridley Scott being a touch heavy-handed sometimes, but it just didn't happen.

The only reason the slight spark of interest came from Marian in armor is that I didn't expect it to go there. Other than that, it just turned me off by seeming...muddy, is the best way I can put it. Maybe they really are just crap trailers, I dunno.

I'm not rubbing my hands gleefully for it to crash and burn or anything; I really am just curious.

(And now I have the Prince of Thieves music running through my head. I may be one of the few people on the planet who actually like that one for more than Alan Rickman.)

Edited at 2010-05-17 03:17 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - yeopard - May. 17th, 2010 11:23 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - wiliqueen - May. 17th, 2010 11:34 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - irish_horse - May. 17th, 2010 01:36 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - yeopard - May. 17th, 2010 01:57 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - wiliqueen - May. 17th, 2010 02:10 pm (UTC) - Expand
( 33 comments — Leave a comment )


Valerie - Postmodern Pollyanna
WiliQueen's Woods

Latest Month

November 2016


Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by chasethestars