?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Interesting article

Where Have All the Singers Gone?

My reaction to Jekyll & Hyde on Broadway was not dissimilar to this writer's to a late-run performance of PotO -- I felt like the stage was full of people who had real voices in there somewhere that they weren't letting out. I couldn't even tell whether or not they knew how, although it seemed like they didn't. What's worse is that I was mentally contrasting them with the pre-Broadway tour I'd seen just two years before, with Robert Cuccioli, Linda Eder, and Christiane Noll. All of whom I therefore knew for a fact knew how to let the voice out -- but you might never know it from listening to Noll on the Broadway cast album! It was enough to make me start wondering if my memory of her voice in person in '96 was accurate, until cuts from The New Moon, a revival of a Victor Herbert operetta she starred in subsequent to J&H, started turning up on my Launch station, demonstrating the assured full soprano I was sure I'd heard in her Lisa (they hadn't changed her name to Emma yet). All I can think is that she was directed (like the King & I incident mentioned by Rebecca Caine in the linked article) to sing in a manner considered by Them What Was In Charge to be more "accessible." The result is that she sounds completely spineless -- which is exactly how the character of Emma is viewed by practically everyone I know who first encountered J&H in that form. She's not written that way at all, but I can't blame people for getting that impression when her voice has been gutted of its power.

Even at this level, I've been flat-out told at one audition to make it "less operatic and more Broadway." (ETA: I should add, for those who don't know me in person, that I'm not as operatic as all that.) And in listening to what they encouraged, it didn't take long to figure out that they really meant "less Shirley Jones and more Kristin Chenoweth in the TV version." Considering that Kristin's rendition of "Till There Was You" on A Prairie Home Companion was one of the few things I've ever heard her do that I didn't much like, that sort of thing doesn't inspire me with confidence. Especially when what I was told to do it on was "My White Knight," the most full-out soprano number in the show! I don't want to hear a wispy Marian the Librarian, any more than I want to hear a wispy Emma Carew. Soprano jokes are identical enough to blonde jokes when we don't go around deliberately sounding like a bunch of six-year-olds!

That said, I'm curious to know when this article was written, because I do think sound vocal technique is at least on the way back to being recognized as an actual asset, partly as the general public is exposed to people like Idina Menzel or Norbert Leo Butz, who demonstrate (like the strong singers in the megamusicals of the 80s) that you can use sound technique in a pop idiom. There are options other than sounding like you should be wearing a horned helmet on the one hand, and sounding like your larynx has no access to your air supply on the other. I'm hearing singers again on recordings of newer shows, and I was despairing of that for a while. I still have hope that Rebecca Caine's comment that "my kind of voice is dead in musicals" is wrong.

Of course, one threat to the improvement trend is coming, ironically enough, from the renaissance of movie musicals, where the very "non-professional-singer" sound coming from the likes of Nicole Kidman and Renee Zellweger is repeatedly remarked upon as a good thing, and is rapidly becoming the standard of what people want to hear. Even in a quasi-classical score like PotO, where knowledgable critics and existing fans overwhelmingly trashed the bejeebers out of Emmy Rossum and Gerry Butler, but the new fans latched onto them as the gold standard. I wrote my own movie review intentionally judging them as pop performances rather than traditional, and I do still enjoy the movie. But it doesn't bode well for the future.

The conventional wisdom is that audiences won't accept classical technique because they don't "understand" it. Yet filmmakers use it for dramatic effect all the time. The exact same principles people are getting in a "subliminal" way in underscoring, and having no problem with, are what we're told they won't accept in the foreground. You don't have to understand what kind of soprano Renee Fleming is to feel the effect of her contribution to LotR. For that matter, people still watch The Sound of Music year after year. You think it matters if they "understand" Julie Andrews' voice?

Yes, some people hear a type of music they're not familiar with and just think it's weird, or fake, or whatever. But frankly, shoving unsuitable voices into it isn't going to change that very much. Meanwhile, in my experience a great many more people react positively -- even if it's "I don't know much about that stuff, but boy is it pretty," that's all it NEEDS to be. It's the myth of "elite" art that's getting in the way, not any actual incomprehensibility of the material.

So, frustrating. But still hopeful spots too.

Tags:

Comments

( 5 comments — Leave a comment )
irish_horse
Dec. 9th, 2005 04:59 pm (UTC)
Hmm. They're starting to require actual ability again? Now my hopes of ever being cast are *definitely* trashed... ;)P

No, honestly, it's a good thing. Too many weak, unsuitable voices have been trotted out in musicals of late and touted as "the next big thing" when there's absolutely nothing big about them. I don't want to see stage singing reduced to the pop idiom. It loses its own integrity and identity as a discrete art form.
wiliqueen
Dec. 9th, 2005 06:15 pm (UTC)
You're right, that's exactly why it bugs me. I like good pop singing too, but that doesn't mean it should completely demolish another genre. Especially the one I love and am trained for! *g* I'm a musical theatre singer -- yes, I have technique and repertoire that are both pop and operatic, but I'm not either of those and would fall flat on my face if I tried to be. I don't what I am to go away!

Also, VAST icon love!
irish_horse
Dec. 9th, 2005 07:28 pm (UTC)
Thankee! I can't recall who I stole it from, but I fell in love the instant I saw it. ;)
amilyn
Dec. 9th, 2005 11:48 pm (UTC)
Isn't Julie Andrews' voice just...different?

I mean, that "round" sound that bugged me on the more operatic La Mancha we listened to on the way home from La Mancha just...isn't what I associate with that pure tone that Julie Andrews always did. ...I guess I'm wondering if Julie Andrews' voice is just plain...special, and doesn't require "understanding" simply because she sounds so...real and unaffected or something.

I really wish I had a real vocabulary to discuss this.
wiliqueen
Dec. 12th, 2005 04:21 pm (UTC)
Isn't Julie Andrews' voice just...different?

Not really. She's the most recognized and arguably best example of the "musical theatre soprano" category, but it is a category.

As an aside, all opera singers sound like Domingo, and certainly not all the time. The ultra-pure thing actually has quite a solid niche even within opera (especially in English and French circles), of which many people tend not to be aware. There are a number of styles under that umbrella. If I played you Mady Mesplé's "Bell Song" from Lakmé, it probably wouldn't be what you think of as "operatic." (Now, you wouldn't understand it per se, but that's mostly becuase it's in French...)

And then there's the separate issue at hand here, of the apparent shortage of singers who also know how to function out from under that umbrella. Nobody would actually put Domingo in a production of La Mancha -- that recording is interesting, but the not best interpretation of the material. But someone like Anthony Warlow can record J&H (I've played you his "Dangerous Game" and "I Need to Know"), and jump back onto the Aussie opera circuit without missing a beat. He has the flexibility to do that, same as Rebecca Caine, and neither is going to sound the same in both environments. The musical theatre style by definition is more "real and unaffected." It's the lack of understanding that you can have that quality and still be a an actual SINGER that is epidemic.
( 5 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

sugarplum
wiliqueen
Valerie - Postmodern Pollyanna
WiliQueen's Woods

Latest Month

November 2016
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by chasethestars